StromTrooper banner

1 - 13 of 13 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
20 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Currently running stock Trailwings on my DL1000.
I am looking at putting on some K60's.

What should I expect in gas milage difference?

Thanks
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,564 Posts
Shouldn't be much. Unless you put really tall tires on and go slow I doubt you'll see any.
I agree that it will be a small enough difference that it would take pretty careful measurement to codify.
In principle there are two conflicting conditions in play with tire size and fuel mileage. One is if the tire is taller than original one gains final drive (gear-ish) ratio. The other is an increase in rotational resistance that comes with a taller and/or heavier tire. Where those to lines cross exactly can be left to the smart kids. But when you look at cars designed solely for fuel efficiency they all have the smallest wheels practical. It appears that the tax for resistance is greater than the revenue of ratio.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,564 Posts
Geeky Tire Trivia

For folks who give a flip, Avon publishes how many revolutions per mile / km each tire size turns.
The tires on my V2 turn the rear tire 30 more revolutions per mile than does the front tire.

I guess that means that the computer engineers for traction control must be calculating the difference / change of percentage of wheel rotation rather than the the actual "speed" change before activation so as to accommodate non-OEM tires. Like I said - trivia.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
660 Posts
I have a 650 and the K60s caused by mileage to drop about 5 to 7 mpg over Trailwings back in 2009. More aggressive tread. for the 1000 I don't think you will see as much a drop.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
502 Posts
I noticed a ~2 mpg change when I went from nearly bald tires to new on my truck. I would assume the more tread increases: rolling resistance - better grip, air resistance - deep tread, rotational resistance - heavier around the outside edge. But a newer tire with new tread should deform less (improve gas mileage) at same air pressure and have a smaller contact patch than a thin / pliable worn tire.

One of the mysteries of the universe
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
350 Posts
It will definitely decrease your mileage, but hard to say by how much. It makes a big difference on car tires. Look at the special low rolling resistance tires they put on the Toyota Prius for example.
 

·
Official Stromtrooper.com Sponsor
Joined
·
5,424 Posts
I would say I lost 2-3 mpg when going from Michelin Pilot Road 4's to the Continental TKC 70. Nothing I checked and calculated, but an obvious reduction.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
31 Posts
More confidence give you a tire, more speed on corners, and more revs results in a reduction of gas millage IMHO. Also, an A/T tyre ups the consommation versus a S/T tyre, on road.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
635 Posts
The other thing that throws off the calculation is that speed and distance are not measured directly (unless you use GPS). Instead, both speed and distance are calculated backwards from wheel revolutions (on an ABS bike, which has sensors on the wheels), or even countershaft revolutions (non-ABS bikes).

This means that tire circumference changes (e.g. replacing old, worn tires with new ones) also lead to apparent mileage changes. Ditto for changes to front/rear sprocket tooth count on non-ABS bikes.

On a 19" tire, 5mm thread wear leads to a reduction of circumference by a fraction over 1%.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,830 Posts
Another story

I do think rolling resistance can make a measurable difference. Changed the rear tire on my 150cc scooter, the top speed (power-limited) went up a couple of MPH, and the average mileage seems to be better as well. More tread, not less, so that's not the sole factor. Since the speedo is cable-operated from the front hub, no change in speedo function. Perhaps more noticeable with less power to work with. But still a factor.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
388 Posts
After keeping accurate records for nearly 100,000km, and running the same tyres all that time, my fuel consumption has varied from 3.84 to 5.1 ltr/100km. This leads me to conclude that there are far more influencing factors on fuel consumption other than tyre type. I'd guess that even a reduction in tyre pressure would effect consumption more than a change to a different type.

Really it's academic, just stick on the rubber you most like then go have fun riding the damm thing.
 
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
Top