Love it, it's Ok or hate it? New DL1000 - Page 10 - Stromtrooper Forum : Suzuki V-Strom Motorcycle Forums
Stromtrooper Forum : Suzuki V-Strom Motorcycle Forums
Go Back   Stromtrooper Forum : Suzuki V-Strom Motorcycle Forums > Popular Forums > DL1000 - 2002-2012


DL1000 - 2002-2012 For those bikes with two pipes

View Poll Results: Love, OK or Hate??
I love it! 132 54.10%
It's OK, I guess... 78 31.97%
I hate the new look! 34 13.93%
Voters: 244. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 10-16-2012, 01:36 PM
Stromthusiast!
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 82
Default

I was really hoping the 1000 would be similar to the new 650. Only minor differences but same looks like they have always been. If they are going to look this much different it shouldn't be called a V-Strom or the 650 should also look similar. It just makes sense that way.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #92  
Old 10-18-2012, 08:28 AM
DBuck12's Avatar
$tromtrooper
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: S.E. Ohio
Posts: 961
Default

What are they thinking?

Once again Suzuki proves that they have absolutely no sense of style. Have they never heard that sometimes "Less is more"?

Suzuki should have fired the guy that designed the B-King. Apparently he still has a job designing ugly motorcycles.

For me to buy this new DL1000 it will have to be lighter, more powerful, handle better and get better mpg than the current model.

Let me qualify that. It will also have to be free of weird assed glitches and other funky shit.

If, and that is a huge IF, they have accomplished all that, I might overlook the ugly and consider it.
__________________
Buck

K3 DL1000

K5 VN1600A
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 10-18-2012, 08:56 AM
Stromthusiast!
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greendale WI
Posts: 518
Default

Overall, no. But I was kind and gave it an Ok just because looks are secondary to me on a bike. Utility, dependability, performance, is how I roll.
__________________
2006 DL1000, 16:43 ratio, Speedohealer, Stebel air horn-PWD mount, Madstad, Suzuki luggage, throttle lock, Richland fork brace.
previous
'03 Honda CB750 Nighthawk
'92 Yamaha Virago 1100
'84 Yamaha Seca 650
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 10-18-2012, 10:24 AM
hunt1moore's Avatar
$tromtrooper
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Monroe, NC
Posts: 1,211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBuck12 View Post
What are they thinking?

Once again Suzuki proves that they have absolutely no sense of style. Have they never heard that sometimes "Less is more"?

Suzuki should have fired the guy that designed the B-King. Apparently he still has a job designing ugly motorcycles.

For me to buy this new DL1000 it will have to be lighter, more powerful, handle better and get better mpg than the current model.

Let me qualify that. It will also have to be free of weird assed glitches and other funky shit. If, and that is a huge IF, they have accomplished all that, I might overlook the ugly and consider it.

I agree with you on this.....mostly.
However, I do have a M109R that looks pretty cool.
__________________
2012 DL1000 Adventure (Tinkerbell)
PC-V, TRE, CR8EIX , ECM, K&N, RDL, PR4, PC-8, EB H4, WERKS, Madstad 22", 17/43 gearing, AdventureTech: Fork brace, shelf, mirror extenders, SpeedoDRD, wheel spacer, Head's-Up voltage monitor, Goldwing pegs, Sonic 1.1.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 10-18-2012, 10:31 AM
Stromthusiast!
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ft. Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 270
Default

I like it best without the luggage.
__________________
I live in my own little world, but it's OK, they know me here.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 10-18-2012, 04:24 PM
garvinzoom's Avatar
Stromthusiast!
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Zanesville Ohio
Posts: 215
Default

I like it, would consider trading the wee for one if they could get comparable fuel mileage.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
2011 DL650 (The Ghost)
1999 Suzuki Bandit 1200 (The wife's rocket)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 10-20-2012, 08:39 AM
DBuck12's Avatar
$tromtrooper
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: S.E. Ohio
Posts: 961
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hunt1moore View Post
I agree with you on this.....mostly.
However, I do have a M109R that looks pretty cool.
I don't mind the M109R styling. But I do prefer the more conservatively styled 109C. But I understand the "C" is somewhat detuned in keeping with its mission.
__________________
Buck

K3 DL1000

K5 VN1600A
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 10-20-2012, 12:15 PM
Big B's Avatar
$tromtrooper
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central OHIO "Go Buckeyes"
Posts: 5,360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bamaboy View Post
If they want to compete they should make one that is more off road also. Like the Tiger 800XC It seems they made this one more street than the old Strom.
It is a niche bike for them, and they don't do things like that.
__________________
BRIAN

2006 SV650 2006 DL1000 "HODOR"




Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 11-13-2012, 11:33 AM
abb1's Avatar
Stromthusiast!
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 220
Default

Damn, I was looking forward to the new style. This just looks like a mechanical chicken.
Sorry, not for me!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 11-13-2012, 01:35 PM
Stromthusiast!
Super Trooper!
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Camden, ny
Posts: 23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by V-Tom View Post
My 69 Norton Commando had a similar setup. Kind of unneccesary as it leaked so much oil in the first place.

..Tom
My 1975 Honda 750 had an adjustable lube set up on the sprocket shaft. It used engine oil. It was so messy even tuned down as much as possible that I eventually turned it off and manually lubed.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiTweet this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.5.2